Dark Jedi
⭐ 9/10
March 30, 2014
There have been plenty of movies based on classical cartoon superheroes that have been poorly implemented and with a lousy story. Luckily this one is not one of those. This was really a very enjoyable movie and I liked this movie a lot better than the first Thor movie which I felt was mostly silly.
This one has a story which was rather okay and held somewhat together. You have to remember that this is a comic book hero and the story is on that…
read the rest.
There have been plenty of movies based on classical cartoon superheroes that have been poorly implemented and with a lousy story. Luckily this one is not one of those. This was really a very enjoyable movie and I liked this movie a lot better than the first Thor movie which I felt was mostly silly.
This one has a story which was rather okay and held somewhat together. You have to remember that this is a comic book hero and the story is on that level of course. The special effects and the scenery is really nice as well. The views of Asgard is cool, almost breathtaking.
Anthony Hopkins was excellent as Odin or Oden has he is called in Sweden, my country of birth. Tom Hiddleston is also very good in his role although I have to say that I really do not like his role but then he is supposed to be one of the bad guys so… Chris Hemsworth is good enough in his role but I would say that he is really the weakest ones in terms of acting.
The movie is liberally sprinkled with jokes as well and, thankfully, most of them are not too bad. Although a bit silly I have to say that I did laugh when Thor politely hung Mjölnir on the clothes rack in the apartment with Darcy and Dr. Selvig.
On the whole I enjoyed this movie tremendously.
show less
Andres Gomez
⭐ 6/10
November 9, 2014
More of the same. Predecible non elaborated script and with a total lack of sense of humor.
The FX are, again, OK, but the feeling of swords, axes, armors and helmets is of cheap plastic.
DoryDarko
⭐ 9/10
February 21, 2017
Watching Thor: The Dark World tonight, I got the feeling that Hollywood might have finally figured it out. In theory, a sequel should always surpass its predecessor, although as we all know, many have tried and famously failed. But a new trend seems to finally be breaking through. X2 was better than X-Men. Spider-Man 2 was better than the first. And now that I've seen it, I can tell you Thor: The Dark World… is better than Thor. (And the fact tha…
read the rest.
Watching Thor: The Dark World tonight, I got the feeling that Hollywood might have finally figured it out. In theory, a sequel should always surpass its predecessor, although as we all know, many have tried and famously failed. But a new trend seems to finally be breaking through. X2 was better than X-Men. Spider-Man 2 was better than the first. And now that I've seen it, I can tell you Thor: The Dark World… is better than Thor. (And the fact that these are all Marvel productions, that's food for anther discussion.)
I thoroughly enjoyed Thor, directed by Kenneth Branagh, when I only saw it for the first time just this spring. In fact, I watched it again the same week. Which is saying enough to imply that my hopes were high for the sequel. So I was really looking forward to tonight and I was not disappointed.
Thor 2 was helmed by a different director, Alan Taylor, which typically always spells trouble in my book when they change the director, but I take my hat off to him. What I admire is that he managed to capture the tone that Branagh set in the first film flawlessly – even perfected it in a way. He brings to the table a duality which almost never works successfully in any film, but here, does so perfectly: Taylor made Thor 2 notably darker, yet at the same time more humorous. I take my hat off to the writers as well – they put in a ton of great jokes, all at the exactly right moment. Had this been done even a fraction less tactfully, the film would have sunk like a bag of bricks, like so many others have. I found myself (and the audience) laughing my butt off one moment, and feeling very serious and engaged with the on-screen emotions the next. Even when it happened abruptly, it still never felt inappropriate. Now that's good entertainment. Two thumbs up.
The actors all wear their roles like a custom-made suit. It's obvious that Chris Hemsworth has really grown into his character, third time around. This guy IS Thor, hands down. The same goes for all the other actors, they were all perfectly comfortable in their roles and respective environments. The one that intrigued me most, however, was Loki – personified absolutely magnificently by Tom Hiddleston. Much like Hemsworth, it seems he was born to play this role. He captures all the slyness, all the arrogance and all the torment of a man almost unable to bear the weight of his own ego in a single flicker in his eyes. And then that grin… Perfection. The way Hiddleston plays Loki is strangely captivating. You know he's totally wicked and cannot be trusted, yet at the same time you can't help but really like him – you might even end up rooting for this guy, and I'm not sure many other actors would have managed this.
All the special effects were as good as one should expect them to be these days. I have nothing much to say there, except that it was all terrifically eye-pleasing, and Asgard looked even more beautiful than before. It was all convincing and very well done.
Still, I have not completely explained why T:TDW is better than the first. Actually, I might not fully be able to. It's mostly a feeling. As much as I was entertained the first time, I was even more entertained now. It was more action-packed, more exciting, darker and it just had a great deal more adrenaline.
The only thing that I think was weaker in this film, was the character of Jane Foster. Her character was just less interesting, kind of blank. I actually don't remember much of her at all, except that she slapped Thor a couple of times and she had all this creepy stuff coming out of her… Also she was somewhat of a damsel-in-distress most of the time with the look of a scared kitten on her face, and that's not exactly how we like to see our ladies nowadays. It's so common to see women being perfectly independent now, that it's a little weird to see a grown woman with "three degrees in physics" (as Darcy so poignantly points out) scared and shivering like a little girl. Most of the time, Natalie Portman just didn't carry her scenes very strongly, and that's strange coming from such a fine actress. So maybe one of the actors was actually a little out of place after all, thinking about it.
Having said that, that's pretty much my only complaint. Every other element in this film was very solid, the story was very good and they absolutely nailed the pacing. Those two hours went by in the blink of a eye.
Thor: The Dark World is wonderfully entertaining and a definite must-see for every Marvel fan. In fact – at the risk of enraging the Marvel Gods – this might just be pretty stiff competition to X-Men… Watch out Wolverine, I think I have a new favorite superhero.
_(November 2013)_
show less
Gimly
⭐ 7/10
October 27, 2017
**A long format review from 2013**
Despite a virtually non-existent (comparatively) promotional campaign for Marvel’s latest effort, Thor: The Dark World has crushed its competition box-office-wise. Though receiving less critical acclaim than Captain Phillips or Gravity, it did clean up in the finance department.
I’ve made no secret of the fact that in the MCU, my favourite Avenger is Thor, so a new film was always going to be an easy ticke…
read the rest.
**A long format review from 2013**
Despite a virtually non-existent (comparatively) promotional campaign for Marvel’s latest effort, Thor: The Dark World has crushed its competition box-office-wise. Though receiving less critical acclaim than Captain Phillips or Gravity, it did clean up in the finance department.
I’ve made no secret of the fact that in the MCU, my favourite Avenger is Thor, so a new film was always going to be an easy ticket from me. And I can’t work out if that bias is making me more critical of the film because I care so much, or less because I’m just happy it got made? I’ll try to be as above board as possible.
Thor 2 is a spectacle, make no mistake. It has the appropriate mix of explosions, attractive people, monsters, humour, fighting, mesmerising visuals, sweet symbolism and heart-wrenching sorrow that can be expected from a decent super hero film. But beyond that, it doesn’t really have much.
I know it sounds like it has a lot, and it honestly does, but I just couldn’t help feeling in a quite a number of moments that the thing felt hurried. Maybe if there wasn’t such a mad rush to get a Thor sequel out by the end of 2013, they could have spent a little more time fleshing out and filling in the script (not that it’s a short movie, I mean the pre-production feels rushed) and better utilising director Alan Taylor (Game of Thrones, Rome, Carnivale). There was a hint of the generic, amongst this otherwise splendid film.
73%
-Gimly
show less
tmdb44006625
⭐ 4/10
March 9, 2019
Thor: The Dark World represents all of the MCU's worst tendencies: shoehorned humour at the expense of good scenes, a cookie cutter underdeveloped villain, and an over reliance on big outlandish explosions. It doesn't help that the story is also convoluted and lame, made even worse because it introduces the second infinity stone.
All in all, Thor: The Dark World is not a terrible movie. It's just far more cliché than its predecessors, and that…
read the rest.
Thor: The Dark World represents all of the MCU's worst tendencies: shoehorned humour at the expense of good scenes, a cookie cutter underdeveloped villain, and an over reliance on big outlandish explosions. It doesn't help that the story is also convoluted and lame, made even worse because it introduces the second infinity stone.
All in all, Thor: The Dark World is not a terrible movie. It's just far more cliché than its predecessors, and that's disappointing.
show less
Justin Lopez
November 6, 2019
I don't understand all the hate surrounding this movie. I loved every bit of it and somehow, to me, it feels like this was even better than its predecessor. Better CGI, a darker, sci-fi fantasy plot and improved action sequences make it a truly great sequel to the first film.
LoganWright
November 7, 2019
Action sequences aside, this movie was a great sequel to the first film. So much character development for Thor and I just love how he reunites with the crew from "Thor,” especially with Jane.
BradleyStewart
November 7, 2019
One of the first Marvel movies I watched and though I don't know a lot yet about him, I can say that Chris Hemsworth plays Thor quite well.
Jane Hall
November 7, 2019
Not as good as the first one. I had my hopes up the whole time as I was able to enjoy the first one, but I guess it really is true that sequels always do worse than the originals.
JessieCollins
November 8, 2019
Not as Thor-y as the first one but definitely gives Thor some character development which, let's all agree, he needs in order for him to establish better his role as one of the main heroes in The Avengers.
John Smith
November 8, 2019
Didn't enjoy it as much as the first one but watched it for the sake of keeping up with the timeline and making sure I wasn't missing any information critical to understanding the next Avengers movie coming out.
1RobertJohnson1
December 23, 2019
Although acting was solid and the production value was still through the roof, I wasn't able to enjoy the movie. Probably because everything else sucked.
MichaelWilliams
December 23, 2019
What happened to the deep story and intelligence that was portrayed in the first Thor film?
WilliamJones
December 23, 2019
If you're wondering why Thor: The Dark World is a title you're not familiar with, it's because you should just stay away from it.
DavidBrown1
December 24, 2019
Boring,a typical plot of everyone else just relying on the main superhero to save the day.
JosephWilson
December 29, 2019
Just stay away from this film. You'd be wasting your time. Mindless, boring plot with lazy writing.
richardmiller
December 29, 2019
You can clearly see that they got lazy with the writing on this one. Big insult to superhero fans and just Thor in general.
ThomasMoore
December 30, 2019
Marvel flopped! Probably their worst film for 2013. It was annoying and everything was just all over the place!
JeffreyYoung
January 2, 2020
Still not a bad film. I personally enjoyed it more than the first Thor movie, but still not comparable to other Marvel films.
JacobKing1
January 2, 2020
The main villain was not that great but I don't think that destroyed the entire movie. There were still some great scenes and the storyline wasn’t all that bad.
NicholasLopez
January 2, 2020
Most of the characters from the first Thor film stayed the way they were - one-dimensional. With exception to Loki, everyone else played subpar.
StephenScott
January 2, 2020
Although it was not as fun and light as the Avengers films, there were still some points that were great. One was how they depicted Asgard - it was plain beautiful. Another was how they wrote the script and the way Asgardian people talked.
LarryAdams
January 2, 2020
I loved it more than the first! The action scenes and plot was better. The acting was fantastic and there was enough banter to keep it from getting too dark.
JustinCampbell
January 2, 2020
I'm just gonna go ahead say it: this is a waste of time.
CharlesTaylor
January 3, 2020
It's a good thing they did great on the first Thor film because this one sucked! At least they'll get one more chance to redeem themselves.
ChristopherAndersen
January 3, 2020
I'm a big Marvel fan but even I can't deny the fact that this film is absolute garbage.
DanielThomas
January 4, 2020
Now I know why no one is talking about this film - it's plain garbage.
MatthewJackson
January 5, 2020
I didn't love this movie but I didn't hate it either. Still decent but Marvel can definitely do better than this.
AnthonyWhite
January 5, 2020
One of the first Marvel movies I've seen so I wouldn't know a lot but I definitely liked the first one better than this.
DonaldHarris
January 5, 2020
It's too bad they weren't able to replicate the success they had with both the Iron Man and Captain America films. Thor had so much potential!
BrandonEvans
January 6, 2020
Sure it's funny but now it feels like Thor is aimed to please kids. It's understandable though because that's the biggest audience right now and a studio has to make money.
BenjaminCollins
January 6, 2020
The movie pacing was too fast. I wasn't able to fully comprehend what was going on. Then the story became totally predictable at one point. I am disappointed.
SamuelSanchez
January 6, 2020
Marvel has produced a lot of films that are watch-worthy, but not this one.
RaymondMorris
January 6, 2020
Marvel should not have tried so hard to give Thor a darker tone. That's DC's job, not theirs.
MarkMartin
January 16, 2020
It would've been better if they gave us more information about the bad guy. Sure he's just another villain but a back story would've still been great.
PaulThompson
January 16, 2020
If you took out the other main characters, like Jane for example, this film would've still made sense. Everything was a mess!
r96sk
⭐ 9/10
January 17, 2021
One of my favourites from the MCU's opening eight releases. Judging by that average rating: Shows what I know, eh?
I seriously enjoyed <em>'Thor: The Dark World'</em>, with it not only surpassing its predessceor from 2011 but all bar <em>'Captain America: The First Avenger'</em> in the MCU thus far also. Each to their own, as always, but I found it great.
Loved the score, one of the more memorable ones from the Marvel Cinematic Universe at …
read the rest.
One of my favourites from the MCU's opening eight releases. Judging by that average rating: Shows what I know, eh?
I seriously enjoyed <em>'Thor: The Dark World'</em>, with it not only surpassing its predessceor from 2011 but all bar <em>'Captain America: The First Avenger'</em> in the MCU thus far also. Each to their own, as always, but I found it great.
Loved the score, one of the more memorable ones from the Marvel Cinematic Universe at this point. I also found the pacing to be near perfect, while the humour fits very well. The plot is entertaining.
Chris Hemsworth is great as Thor, while Natalie Portman gives a performance worth noting - unlike in the original. I admit I wasn't overly happy to see Tom Hiddleston appear again, given his character isn't good enough to be in three MCU films, but he is satisfactory here. The rest of the cast are solid, too.
I thoroughly enjoyed it, what can I say?
show less
CinemaSerf
⭐ 7/10
June 3, 2024
Alan Taylor picks up where Sir Kenneth Branagh left off and delivers a dark, more menacing, action adventure with "Thor" (Chris Hemsworth) having to thwart the aspirations of the dark elves led by "Malekith" (Christopher Eccleston). The elves are desperate to obtain the "Aether" - a source of unspeakable power. Meantime, "Jane" (Natalie Portman) and an increasingly off the rails "Selvig" (Stellan Skarsgård) are on Earth continuing their search fo…
read the rest.
Alan Taylor picks up where Sir Kenneth Branagh left off and delivers a dark, more menacing, action adventure with "Thor" (Chris Hemsworth) having to thwart the aspirations of the dark elves led by "Malekith" (Christopher Eccleston). The elves are desperate to obtain the "Aether" - a source of unspeakable power. Meantime, "Jane" (Natalie Portman) and an increasingly off the rails "Selvig" (Stellan Skarsgård) are on Earth continuing their search for a way to communicate with Asgard again. When she accidentally gets sucked into a wormhole, she becomes a target for the evil elf, and after he conquers Asgard, all nine worlds are at risk of being subsumed into perpetual darkness. As with the first film, there is humour here - there is chemistry on screen between Tom Hiddleston's untrustworthy "Loki" and Hemsworth, as between him and Portman. Skarsgård seems to spend a fair amount of the film in his underpants, and it all happens under the sparingly delivered gaze of Sir Anthony Hopkins. The story is good, and forgetting for a moment that Eccleston is not (remotely), this makes for an enjoyable to watch film that remains completely detached from the Marvel/SHIELD series and it should be appreciated for that too.
show less
Pratik Ghare
⭐ 7/10
May 1, 2025
Thor: The Dark World may not have been perfect, but it captured a unique blend of myth, magic, and Marvel charm that feels nostalgic now. Watching it reminds me of a time when the MCU had heart, humor, and a sense of wonder. I miss the days when Marvel felt fresh and genuinely fun.
Manuel São Bento
⭐ 5/10
September 29, 2025
Rewatched for the Once Upon a Franchise podcast. Listen to the full episode here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/685I7rKWu6MYlAJlQOg3xG?si=c90ac84e8f62472b
Revisiting THOR: THE DARK WORLD, it's impossible to ignore its reputation as one of the MCU's lowest points. My experience, however, was that of a film less outright bad and more profoundly uninteresting, with moments of genuine brilliance that are quickly smothered by a haze of confused …
read the rest.
Rewatched for the Once Upon a Franchise podcast. Listen to the full episode here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/685I7rKWu6MYlAJlQOg3xG?si=c90ac84e8f62472b
Revisiting THOR: THE DARK WORLD, it's impossible to ignore its reputation as one of the MCU's lowest points. My experience, however, was that of a film less outright bad and more profoundly uninteresting, with moments of genuine brilliance that are quickly smothered by a haze of confused ideas. The opening sequence, for instance, is surprisingly effective, establishing the threat of the Dark Elves with competent fight sequences and a score by Brian Tyler (IRON MAN 3) that injects a real sense of adventure. The subsequent invasion of Asgard and Frigga's funeral are the movie's true highlights: the former is a tense and consequential action set piece, while the latter is arguably the most beautiful and emotional moment in the entire film. However, it's here that it begins to fall apart. The villain, Malekith, is a generic and forgettable figure with bland motivations, and the movie never truly decides on its central story. It tries to be a romance between Thor and Jane, a family drama about the succession to Asgard's throne, and a cosmic epic about the threat of the Aether, but it fails to weave these threads together cohesively, resulting in a tonally confused and narratively unfocused experience.
The film's biggest problem lies in its treatment of its characters and the lack of a cohesive arc. Jane Foster, who was a clever and proactive scientist in the first movie, is reduced here to a damsel in distress and a mere vessel for the Aether, becoming a plot device instead of a character. Thor himself lacks any meaningful development; his final declaration about preferring to be a good man rather than a great king feels like an afterthought, as his desire for the throne is never truly explored throughout the film. This lack of depth extends to the climax, a dull and VFX-heavy battle that relies on a gigantic plot coincidence to function. In the end, THOR: THE DARK WORLD isn't as terrible as collective memory has painted it, but it remains hopelessly unmemorable. It's almost a "filler" movie, an entry that could be skipped entirely without losing many important pieces of the grand MCU puzzle.
Rating: C
show less